I haven't been following the whole battle over Internet radio because I don't really listen to it that often and that I just figured that the Record Industry Association of America (RIAA) was only shooting themselves in the foot. This morning I was asked to write
a blog post for Amazon about a new development in Internet radio's impending demise: SoundExchange decided not to enforce its crippling new royalty fees, which were due on Monday.
So, because I haven't been paying attention to this issue, I did a little research and was surprised what I learned. According to Wikipedia, SoundExchange doesn't just collect royalties for its members, but collects royalties for non-members as well. Gosh, that's awfully nice of them. If I write a song and it gets played on an Internet radio station, they will collect the royalties, but for me to claim those royalties, I will have to pay them a fee for administrative expenses. Well, okay, that only seems fair.
But here's where I gasped. There is no way to opt out of the collection. That means that Sound Exchange collects royalties on Creative Commons works! Creative Commons is a copyright alternative that allows creators to retain some rights to their work while giving away other rights for the public good. For example, the image I'm using in this blog post is covered under a Creative Commons license that allows me to use the image for free as long as I give credit for the image and don't use the image to make money.
This is why I thought the RIAA was shooting itself in the foot. Clearly, they want to kill Internet radio. It's a mostly hobby industry that generates little revenue and yet opens their assets to piracy. Since there is an obvious demand for Internet radio, I thought the stations could survive by playing independent acts using Creative Commons to bypass the industry, create an audience, and get their music heard.
This ruling by the Copyright Office effectively cuts off the retreat of webcasters into CC. Let that sink in for a moment. It makes it illegal for you to write and perform a song and give it to a webcaster to play for free. You can give it away as a free download, but you can't stream a song for free.
That made me mad. It's just one more brass-knuckle tactic that makes the RIAA so easy to dislike. They realize that their 20th century purpose as quality gatekeepers and music suppliers has been made obsolete by digital music. They're getting desperate to hold onto their power. Media bubbles up now. It no longer trickles down.
I called local offices for my two Senators and my Congressman and urged them to support the Internet Radio Equality Act,
S. 1353 in the Senate and
H.R. 2060 in the House of Representatives. I hope you will, too.
Labels: freedom, Internet, politics